![non-contact-probe-works-better-with-a-little-more-complexity-[hackaday]](https://i0.wp.com/upmytech.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/57880-non-contact-probe-works-better-with-a-little-more-complexity-hackaday.png?resize=800%2C313&ssl=1)
Non-Contact Probe Works Better with a Little More Complexity [Hackaday]
Non-contact voltage probes have been around a while and some test equipment now has them built-in. This is one of those things that you probably don’t think about much, but surely it isn’t that hard to detect AC voltage. Turns out there are a lot of circuits floating around that can do it and [nsievers51] tried a bunch. Many didn’t work very well, but the best used a 4069 CMOS hex inverter. A dollar store flashlight provided power, a case, and an LED and the result was a good-looking and effective probe.
The circuit came from the Electronics Library website and is fairly complex for this sort of device. The CMOS inverters have a high input impedance so they pick up the weak signal. Instead of directly driving an LED, two inverters form a ring oscillator that generate pulses around 1 kHz. At that frequency, the LED appears to be on, but battery consumption is less severe. A single 2N2222-style transistor drives the LED.
We’ve seen a number of variations on this tool in the past. Many of them only use transistors.