Best Air Purifiers for 2024 [CNET]

These air purifiers will make sure the air you breathe is cleaner and safer for a healthier living.

Coverage and size

The primary consideration in buying an air purifier for home use is how much square footage you’re trying to cover. Trying to save money by getting a smaller air purifier than what you actually need will just give you disappointing results. The air purifiers on this list all have high proficiency, so any one of them will effectively clean the air in your home, provided they’re the correct size, placed appropriately and the filters and prefilters are maintained accordingly. After room capacity, the amount of space the device itself takes up may be important based on the geography of your room and where you’re hoping to put it. 

Budget

When considering your budget for an air purifier, you might also want to consider the cost of replacing the filter roughly every six months.

Types of air purifier

While this list consists only of HEPA air purifiers, which are the most available and highest-functioning models on the market, several of them use more than one type of filtration technology. To better understand those aspects of your air purifier, or if you want to consider buying another type of air purifier, here’s a breakdown of all of the different methods of air purification technology:

HEPA air purifiers: Standing for “high-efficiency particulate air,” air purifiers with HEPA technology use a fiberglass filter that traps particles of a certain size out of the air.

Activated carbon air purifiers: Where HEPA filters manage solid particles in the air, most of the air purifiers on this list also include activated carbon technology (which is the same thing as activated charcoal), whose porous nature helps filter gasses or volatile organic compounds out of the air. Gasses in your home air typically present themselves as odors from pets, cigarettes or cooking.

Negative ion air purifiers: Ionic or negative ion air purifiers work by using high voltage to give an electrical charge to particles or molecules in the air, which causes them to clump together and then seek out positively charged molecules with which to bond. Certain models that use this type of technology also include a positively charged collector plate that the ionized particles will stick to, taking them out of the air. (Without a collector plate, these particles are no longer circulating in the air, but may hang on surfaces to be cleaned or vacuumed out of your home.) Most models employing this technology don’t use fans, which requires more time to filter the air in a room but also makes for extremely quiet conditions. Molekule and Dyson make popular models that use variants of this type of technology.

UVGI air purifiers: “Ultraviolet germicidal irradiation” air purifiers are similar in mechanical function to HEPA air purifiers, in that they use fans to recirculate the air to purify it quickly. Inside the device, UVGI air purifiers rely on shielded ultraviolet light to neutralize dust and allergens. This type of technology isn’t available in air purifiers for home use and is typically employed in larger systems available for public settings such as office buildings.

Location and living conditions

For some people, having an air purifier in the house may be more of a necessity than a luxury. If you live in an area where allergy season tends to wreak havoc or where wildfires and smoky skies are common, an air purifier can seriously help improve the breathability of the air in your house. The COVID-19 pandemic and the increased wildfire activity have made people more aware of air quality. (Arguably severe allergy sufferers have always been aware of air quality.) While having an air purifier isn’t a failsafe against any diseases — you’re more likely to get sick from repeated close contact with someone in your home than from particles lingering in the air long enough to get filtered out — they can be especially effective for those with asthma or allergies. 

Depending on your living conditions, if numerous pollutants are affecting the air in your home, the cleaner air and increased airflow that air purifiers provide can make a big difference for the quality of life (and air) of those in your household. If you’re thinking of getting an air purifier and want additional reassurance, it may be worth speaking to your doctor or allergist.

There’s a good amount of research and expert guidance that goes into choosing the best air purifier for you and your family. First, consider how much you can comfortably invest in air purification. Will you need an ionic air purifier or a full home filtration system? Do you want a purifier with an activated carbon filter? We’re here to answer those questions and help you sort through your options.

To help inform our air purifier picks, we gathered 14 of the most popular models at the CNET Labs product testing facility in Louisville, Kentucky, where we put them through the same rigorous set of tests. Working with trusty lab associate Eric Snyder, our goal was to determine which air purifiers offered the best performance in terms of particle removal efficiency, energy consumption and quietness, while also evaluating their respective feature sets and value. Tag along as we unveil the science behind our thought process.

The particle-removal test

As you may already know, the air we breathe isn’t just air. If you were to walk outside in the middle of the night and turn on a flashlight, you’d bear witness to a universe of tiny fragments floating around and being carried by the wind. What is that stuff, anyway?

In truth, it’s a combination of anthropogenic (human-generated) and naturally occurring particles. The former is composed mostly of urban, industrial and automotive emissions of hydrocarbons, nitrogen oxides and combustion byproducts, and the latter is mostly represented by smoke from forest fires, sulfates, soot and matter from volcanic activity around the globe. We are, at all times, breathing in a mixture of it all.

According to the US Environmental Protection Agency, some of these microscopic solids and liquid droplets, which can be made up of hundreds of different chemicals, are so tiny that it’s almost inevitable to inhale them. PM10 and PM2.5, which are particles of less than 10 and 2.5 micrometers in diameter, respectively, pose the greatest risk to human health since once inhaled, they allocate deep into the lungs and even into the bloodstream, impairing the proper functionality of the lungs and heart.

Air purifiers are supposed to help us improve indoor air quality conditions by removing these types of particles from the air — but how well do they do that? That’s where our CNET Labs team comes in. Put simply, our mission was to create an environment in which we exposed each air purifier unit to particle-saturated air of roughly the same concentration to assess how quickly and efficiently they get the air back to breathable conditions.

To achieve this, we needed to find a way to produce a quantifiable and fairly repeatable amount of particles; an environment or “test chamber” in which these particles and the air purifier units would be contained; and an accurate particle counter that acts as our control device and allows us to visualize this data. Here’s what we came up with:

Custom-made smoke bombs, which are made of 50% potassium nitrate (KNO3), 40% sucrose (sugar) and 10% sodium bicarbonate (baking soda), and a safety fuse for safe ignition at a distance. The sugar acts as our fuel source, while the potassium nitrate acts as an oxidizing agent and the baking soda ensures that our dry mixture sustains a slow and even burn.

Our air purifier test chamber was designed and built by Eric and myself. Its features include a clear-view front panel made of plexiglass and gloved hand access on the right, which allows us to manipulate the air purifiers, a particle counter holder for our control device, two fans that ensure proper mixing of the air and smoke inside the chamber, vent ports that ensure there is a small amount of fresh air at all times, an ignition port to light up the smoke bombs from outside the rig, and an exhaust port that removes the remaining smoke safely from the chamber and the building after each test. The chamber is not hermetically sealed, but it’s tight enough to ensure that no hazardous amount of smoke escapes to the surroundings.

Using the Temtop PMD331 Particle Counter, we were able to verify that only 5 grams of our smoke bomb dry mixture produces roughly between 590 million and 610 million particles per meter cubed. The device is able to count particles of different sizes, including PM2.5 and PM10, and it logs this data once every 15 seconds. Although we’re able to count particles of different sizes individually, it’s the total number of particles we care about; that is, the sum of all particles of different sizes.

Having figured out the essentials, our testing procedure is carried out as follows: we turn on the particle counter and let it run continuously. We prepare a 5-gram smoke bomb, which is ignited via the ignition port after installing the air purifier and ensuring proper sealing. Once the air in the chamber becomes particle-saturated (greater than 580 million particles/m3) we turn on the air purifier in question. The data extracted from the Temtop allows us to accurately track the impact that the air purifier has on the particle count in real time.

Under normal conditions — that is, when there was no smoke in the test chamber — the total particle count reported by the Temtop was around the 10 million mark, so think about this as the “finish line” for this particle removal race. In our test logic, the faster the air purifier gets the particle count back below 10 million particles per meter cubed, the better. We carry out this test twice for each air purifier, one at the lowest fan setting and another at the highest fan setting to visualize the range of operation of each unit. Check out the results for each unit we tested at both low and high fan settings in the GIFs below:

The noise level test

This is a simple test, but one that’s telling. Using a decibel meter, we measure how loud the air purifiers are at their low, medium and high fan settings. This is particularly important if you plan on having your air purifier in your bedroom and leaving it running through the night without disrupting your sleep.

We perform this test in our sound-enhancing studio to make sure that the decibel meter picks up only soundwave stimuli from the air purifiers, excluding other possible sources. The lower this number, the quieter the air purifier runs. You can see the results for yourself in the graph below; each unit we tested clocked in at around 35 decibels at its low setting, but we saw greater differentiation at medium and high settings.

Energy consumption

If you’re like me and your allergies are your worst enemy, you’d prefer it if your air purifier is running all the time. The only concern is that your energy bill will definitely increase, but by how much?

To answer this question, we use a device called Kill-a-Watt and measure how much power each air purifier consumes at different fan settings. From there, we can correlate this to the average monthly cost of running the unit nonstop. All you need to know is the energy cost per Kilowatt-hour in your state. The following formula describes it best:

The average cost to run an air purifier nonstop for a month = watts consumed/1000 * 24 hours * 30 days * average utility cost per kWh in your state.

The chart below shows how much each air purifier we tested would cost to run for an entire month at its high fan setting in a variety of states with different energy rates.

Levoit Core Mini: The tiniest and most affordable of the bunch, which is great considering it has a 3-stage filtration system and you can even add essential oils for aromatherapy. Bottom-of-the-table performance, unfortunately. 

Medify MA-25: The performance didn’t justify the price of this unit. It struggled in our particle removal test and was the loudest of the small-sized air purifiers we tested. 

Kenmore 850e: This unit offers decent particle removal efficiency thanks to its three-stage filtration system and sports a touchscreen display and dimmable night light. It wasn’t quite as strong a performer as our top pick for small rooms, the BlueAir Pure 511, but at a list price of $67, it’s a budget-friendly alternative.

GermGuardian AC4300: Comes equipped with a HEPA filter with an added antimicrobial agent, an activated charcoal filter and UV-C light as a germicide and a filter change indicator. It was just a middle-of-the-pack performer. 

Levoit Core 400s: Our runner-up for medium-sized spaces. It’s the most expensive medium-sized air purifier we tested but it offers great performance in all test categories. Features include Wi-Fi connectivity, voice control and the VeSync app, which allows you to monitor air quality and control the unit remotely. It’s also compatible with Google Assistant and Alexa.

TruSens Z-2000: Aso in the lower bracket in terms of particle removal efficiency. It does come with an air quality sensor and UV-C light, both of which make it a decent option for the price. 

Coway Airmega AP-1512: Above-average performance overall. Sports a color-coded air quality indicator, eco-mode and filter alerts and has an ionizer option that enhances bacteria and virus removal.

CleanForce CP-Rainbow: I was impressed by the performance of this unit. It was the fastest air purifier at removing particles at the high fan setting, removing all smoke particles in just 1 minute and 45 seconds, which is just incredible. It comes with app control and voice command, an HD LED display for air quality monitoring and color-coded indicators. It offers just a hair fewer features than our winner for best air purifiers for large spaces, but it’s considerably more expensive, which is why it’s not topping the list. 

Coway Airmega 400S: Acceptable performance, very sophisticated filtration system, voice and app control, air quality monitoring via the app and color-coded LED indicators on the unit. There are just better options for the price. 

EnviroKlenz Mobile UV: The highlight of this unit is that it comes with two UV-C bulbs to eliminate airborne bacteria and viruses. Other than that, it’s quite large and heavy, sitting at 40 pounds. It took the longest to purify the air in our particle removal test, and it’s quite expensive both to buy and operate.

Veva 8000: Not a lot to highlight about this unit other than the low cost and the super quiet design. It was a bottom-of-the-pack performer in our particle removal test and in terms of energy efficiency, as well. 

You may have heard of another air purifier called Molekule, which grabbed headlines for its attractive design and proprietary filtration technology back in 2017. The Molekule presents a complicated problem: Its maker claims its proprietary PECO air filter destroys airborne particles much smaller than 0.03 micrometer, but it filters air at such a slow rate that, even if the company’s claims are accurate, it cleans the air inefficiently compared with HEPA air purification models (as Consumer Reports rightly pointed out in its highly critical review).

We have tested but don’t currently recommend the Molekule Air Mini Plus as a result of these problems, as well as a 2020 decision by the National Advertising Review Board to force a retraction of many of Molekule’s misleading advertising claims. The air purifier does appear to address a problem that most HEPA filtration cleaners simply don’t: the presence of gaseous pollutants in the home. Such pollutants have plenty of sources, whether from paint, furniture, cleaning solutions or even some composite boards. For that reason alone, Molekule’s eye-catching brand is worth keeping tabs on, especially since the company merged with AeroClean — a pathogen elimination technology company –in October 2022.

Dyson’s devices offer a similar but slightly different problem. Some of its air purifiers, such as the Dyson Pure Cool TP04, which we also tested in previous years, use a HEPA filter, but provide no CADR. A Dyson spokesperson told us, “CADR as measured by some current methods is not an accurate representation of a real home,” and thus the company has developed its own testing procedures “to replicate a more realistic setting.” That includes a testing room that has over double the footprint of AHAM’s testing rooms, along with nine sensors placed around the space (versus AHAM’s single sensor). The Dyson TP04, perhaps unsurprisingly, performs well according to Dyson’s own metrics.

In addition, the Dyson TP04 air purifier includes a handful of extra goodies, including an oscillating fan to help circulate clean air around larger rooms, an app with home air quality data and a small but nifty display. Is all that worth the considerable price bump? We’ll have a much better sense once we’ve had a chance to test it out in our new test chamber, but until then, we suspect there are better values to be had.